Loading pcbnew/specctra_export.cpp +12 −15 Original line number Original line Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -983,15 +983,12 @@ void SPECCTRA_DB::FromBOARD( BOARD* aBoard ) throw( IOError ) int curTrackWidth = aBoard->m_BoardSettings->m_CurrentTrackWidth; int curTrackWidth = aBoard->m_BoardSettings->m_CurrentTrackWidth; int curTrackClear = aBoard->m_BoardSettings->m_TrackClearence; int curTrackClear = aBoard->m_BoardSettings->m_TrackClearence; // The 0.5 is to give freerouter a little extra room, this is 0.5 mils. // Add .1 mil to the requested clearances as a safety margin. // If we export without this, then on import freerouter violates our // There has been disagreement about interpretation of clearance in the past // DRC checks with track to via spacing, although this could be a // between Kicad and Freerouter, so keep this safetyMargin until the // result of > testing vs. >= testing in PCBNEW's DRC. // disagreement is resolved and stable. Recently Kicad started adding // double safetyMargin = 0.5; // 0.1 mils to what it is given, so we can use zero for now. const double safetyMargin = 0.0; // recent freerouter code adds .1 to the requested clearances, and I want .5 // so subtract .1 so we actually get 0.5. double safetyMargin = 0.4; double clearance = scale(curTrackClear); double clearance = scale(curTrackClear); Loading @@ -1004,13 +1001,13 @@ void SPECCTRA_DB::FromBOARD( BOARD* aBoard ) throw( IOError ) rules.push_back( rule ); rules.push_back( rule ); // On a high density board, a typical solder mask clearance will be 2-3 mils. // On a high density board, a typical solder mask clearance will be 2-3 mils. // This exposes 2 to 3 mils of bare board around each pad. So we need at least // This exposes 2 to 3 mils of bare board around each pad, and would // 2 mils *extra* clearance for tracks which would come near a pad on // leave only 1 to 2 mils of solder mask between the solder mask's boundary // to the edge of any trace within "clearance" of the pad. So we need at least // 2 mils *extra* clearance for traces which would come near a pad on // a different net. So if the baseline trace to trace clearance was say 4 mils, then // a different net. So if the baseline trace to trace clearance was say 4 mils, then // the SMD to track clearance should be at least 6 mils. Then, because // the SMD to trace clearance should be at least 6 mils. Also add our safetyMargin. // freerouter seems to be off about a 1/2 mil on clearance tests, add sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type default_smd))", clearance + 2.0 + safetyMargin ); // another .5 mil for this test discrepancy as a safety margin. sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type default_smd))", clearance + safetyMargin + 2.0 ); rules.push_back( rule ); rules.push_back( rule ); /* see: http://www.freerouting.net/usren/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=339#p474 /* see: http://www.freerouting.net/usren/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=339#p474 Loading Loading
pcbnew/specctra_export.cpp +12 −15 Original line number Original line Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -983,15 +983,12 @@ void SPECCTRA_DB::FromBOARD( BOARD* aBoard ) throw( IOError ) int curTrackWidth = aBoard->m_BoardSettings->m_CurrentTrackWidth; int curTrackWidth = aBoard->m_BoardSettings->m_CurrentTrackWidth; int curTrackClear = aBoard->m_BoardSettings->m_TrackClearence; int curTrackClear = aBoard->m_BoardSettings->m_TrackClearence; // The 0.5 is to give freerouter a little extra room, this is 0.5 mils. // Add .1 mil to the requested clearances as a safety margin. // If we export without this, then on import freerouter violates our // There has been disagreement about interpretation of clearance in the past // DRC checks with track to via spacing, although this could be a // between Kicad and Freerouter, so keep this safetyMargin until the // result of > testing vs. >= testing in PCBNEW's DRC. // disagreement is resolved and stable. Recently Kicad started adding // double safetyMargin = 0.5; // 0.1 mils to what it is given, so we can use zero for now. const double safetyMargin = 0.0; // recent freerouter code adds .1 to the requested clearances, and I want .5 // so subtract .1 so we actually get 0.5. double safetyMargin = 0.4; double clearance = scale(curTrackClear); double clearance = scale(curTrackClear); Loading @@ -1004,13 +1001,13 @@ void SPECCTRA_DB::FromBOARD( BOARD* aBoard ) throw( IOError ) rules.push_back( rule ); rules.push_back( rule ); // On a high density board, a typical solder mask clearance will be 2-3 mils. // On a high density board, a typical solder mask clearance will be 2-3 mils. // This exposes 2 to 3 mils of bare board around each pad. So we need at least // This exposes 2 to 3 mils of bare board around each pad, and would // 2 mils *extra* clearance for tracks which would come near a pad on // leave only 1 to 2 mils of solder mask between the solder mask's boundary // to the edge of any trace within "clearance" of the pad. So we need at least // 2 mils *extra* clearance for traces which would come near a pad on // a different net. So if the baseline trace to trace clearance was say 4 mils, then // a different net. So if the baseline trace to trace clearance was say 4 mils, then // the SMD to track clearance should be at least 6 mils. Then, because // the SMD to trace clearance should be at least 6 mils. Also add our safetyMargin. // freerouter seems to be off about a 1/2 mil on clearance tests, add sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type default_smd))", clearance + 2.0 + safetyMargin ); // another .5 mil for this test discrepancy as a safety margin. sprintf( rule, "(clearance %.6g (type default_smd))", clearance + safetyMargin + 2.0 ); rules.push_back( rule ); rules.push_back( rule ); /* see: http://www.freerouting.net/usren/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=339#p474 /* see: http://www.freerouting.net/usren/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=339#p474 Loading